I just got back from the eye doctor a couple hours ago. Got my right eye cornea scrapped and polished. Trying to remove some of the old scarring from the RK surgery I had done in the mid 90s. Going back in a couple of weeks to get the left eye done. After that, I’ll have to get the cataracts developing in my right eye dealt with. Had the cataract surgery in my left eye done a couple of years ago. The fun never stops!
[GOA News] Stop Biden’s VA from DISARMING Veterans
More than 250,000 have already lost their 2A rights… The men and women who risked their lives to defend our country shouldn’t have to risk losing their constitutional rights when they access life-saving mental health treatment. But for years, government bureaucrats have abused the unconstitutional “fiduciary rule” to arbitrarily report veterans to the NICS background check database. As a result, …<br/> <a class="postReadMore" href="https://www.gunowners.org/stop-bidens-va-from-disarming-veterans/">Read more<i class="fa fa-angle-double-right"></i></a>
[b][FPC News] FPC and FPCAF Respond to Administrative Stay in Lawsuit Challenging ATF ?/b]
<p><strong>FORT WORTH, TX</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">July 18, 2</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">023) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and FPC Action Foundation (FPCAF) responded to a federal judge granting a 7-day administrative stay on the summary judgment he </span><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/fpc_and_fpcaf_win_federal_judge_vacates_atf_s_unlawful_frame_or_receiver_rule"><span style="font-weight: 400;">issued</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> for the plaintiffs in </span><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/vanderstok"><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">VanDerStok v. Garland</span></em></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, which challenges the ATF’s “frame or receiver” rule. The order can be viewed at </span><a href="http://fpclegal.org"><span style="font-weight: 400;">FPCLegal.org</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
[FPC News] FPC and FPCAF Fight Back Against Government Attempt to Reinstate ATF’s
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS, LA</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">July 21, 2</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">023) – Yesterday, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and FPC Action Foundation (FPCAF) filed a brief opposing the federal government’s </span><a href="https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/6573/attachments/original/1689706631/VanDerStok_v_Garland_Motion_for_Stay_Pending_Appeal.pdf?1689706631"><span style="font-weight: 400;">motion</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> for a stay pending appeal in </span><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/vanderstok"><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">VanDerStok v. Garland</span></em></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, which asks the Fifth Circuit to allow ATF to enforce its “frame or receiver” rule while the lawsuit continues–despite the fact that a federal court already found the rule to be an illegal usurpation of ATF’s congressionally limited authority. The brief can be viewed at </span><a href="http://fpclegal.org"><span style="font-weight: 400;">FPCLegal.org</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
[FPC News] FPC AND FPCAF WIN: Fifth Circuit Denies Government Attempt to Reinstate A
<p><strong>NEW ORLEANS, LA</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">July 24, 2</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">023) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and FPC Action Foundation (FPCAF) announced that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied the federal government’s attempt to completely stay the district court’s decision in </span><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/vanderstok"><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">VanDerStok v. Garland</span></em></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, which vacated ATF’s unlawful “frame or receiver” rule. This decision, which the Fifth Circuit stayed for 10 days, prevents ATF from enforcing the rule’s “regulatory definitions of ‘frame or receiver’ and ‘firearm’ as applied to the Gun Control Act of 1968,” while allowing the (non-challenged) remainder of the rule to be enforced while ATF appeals the district court Order. The Fifth Circuit’s Order can be viewed at </span><a href="http://fpclegal.org"><span style="font-weight: 400;">FPCLegal.org</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
