![]() |
|
[GOA News] Suppressors Are Protected — So Why Is the DOJ Still Upholding the 1934 - Printable Version +- AlphaRomeo15 (https://www.alpharomeo15.org) +-- Forum: Incoming Chatter (https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Forum-Incoming-Chatter) +--- Forum: Gun Laws and News (https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Forum-Gun-Laws-and-News) +--- Thread: [GOA News] Suppressors Are Protected — So Why Is the DOJ Still Upholding the 1934 (/Thread-GOA-News-Suppressors-Are-Protected-%E2%80%94-So-Why-Is-the-DOJ-Still-Upholding-the-1934) |
[GOA News] Suppressors Are Protected — So Why Is the DOJ Still Upholding the 1934 - Alphie - 10-24-2025 [GOA News] Suppressors Are Protected — So Why Is the DOJ Still Upholding the 1934 The Department of Justice — under Attorney General Pam Bondi — is defending one of the most outdated and unconstitutional gun control laws in America: the National Firearms Act of 1934. In the Peterson case before the Fifth Circuit, DOJ attorneys admitted that suppressors are protected by the Second Amendment, but they’re still fighting to uphold the NFA’s registration scheme … Read more https://www.gunowners.org/na102225/ RE: [GOA News] Suppressors Are Protected — So Why Is the DOJ Still Upholding the 1934 - specops56 - 10-24-2025 Because Bondi never was pro 2A and Trump doesn't care. Terry |