https://www.alpharomeo15.org/ Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:16:01 +0000 MyBB https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Navy-Crucified-a-Retired-Officer%E2%80%A6 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 09:39:19 +0000 Rampy]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Navy-Crucified-a-Retired-Officer%E2%80%A6
It’s the Armed Forces

Not the Sometimes Armed Forces@

The problem is not this incident, or even her response to it. The real problem is that we still have not dealt with the underlying code.

Weapons kill people. Full stop. What few are willing to say out loud is that SECWAR’s guidance, if followed seriously, will lead to deaths.

Someone will accidentally discharge a weapon on base. Maybe more than one person will. Someone may bleed out.

It is entirely possible a soldier leaves a pistol in his car, a child finds it, and tragedy follows.

That is not good. It should be prevented wherever possible. We should teach proper storage. We should teach proper handling. We should reduce avoidable mistakes.

But warriors are human, and humans make mistakes. If you cannot accept the risk of individual deaths, then you are, whether you admit it or not, accepting something worse: defeat.

There are millions of people of unknown allegiance inside our borders. There are hardened criminals here too. There are hostile nations and extremist movements that would gladly take American lives and have every intention of keeping soldiers from reaching base when the balloon goes up.

You must accept training accidents, negligent discharges, and lethal mistakes if you want a force that is truly ready for war.

And readiness does prevent war.

So no, the problem is not simply that he made a mistake and she punished him.

The problem is that she is almost certainly calling friends and fellow officers right now, and they are almost certainly telling her she did the right thing.

“What if his kid found it?”

“What if it went off by accident?”

“What if, what if, what if.”

And with every call, more smart people get pulled in. They come armed with better language, cleaner rationalizations, and safer-sounding excuses. Before long, the “she wasn’t wrong” line spreads like wildfire.

But she was wrong.

He made a mistake. She made a bigger one.

Neither of them should lose a career over this. But both of them need to understand commander’s intent.

Both need to grasp the broader implications of SECWAR’s directive.

Both need to reject safetyism and embrace fundamental safe practices.

And if she refuses, if she cares more about shielding a few individuals from a hypothetical risk of death than about preserving the strength, readiness, and deterrent power that protect millions of American children, then she should be removed.

I don’t care that she is a woman. I don’t care that woman tend to socialize problems amongst themselves more than men. What is dangerous is the fact those phone calls she has with friends and colleagues aren’t public.

Women are more socially. They are more chatty. They are less likely to accept an order from a man without discussing it amongst themselves first.

That’s a good thing. It’s a great thing.

We need more people challenging orders.

Problem is those discussions need to be made public. There needs to be documentation. But Navy culture doesn’t allow it.

What worries me the most isn’t the fact she disobeyed orders (she probably made the decision before it was announced) the problem is I know there are people whispering in her ear and others “she wasn’t wrong, what if a kid found that?”

She was wrong.

There is a silent resistance to everything Hegseth is doing. And the core of that resistance is whispering in the halls.  That’s not helping anyone…. John A Konrad up]]>
It’s the Armed Forces

Not the Sometimes Armed Forces@

The problem is not this incident, or even her response to it. The real problem is that we still have not dealt with the underlying code.

Weapons kill people. Full stop. What few are willing to say out loud is that SECWAR’s guidance, if followed seriously, will lead to deaths.

Someone will accidentally discharge a weapon on base. Maybe more than one person will. Someone may bleed out.

It is entirely possible a soldier leaves a pistol in his car, a child finds it, and tragedy follows.

That is not good. It should be prevented wherever possible. We should teach proper storage. We should teach proper handling. We should reduce avoidable mistakes.

But warriors are human, and humans make mistakes. If you cannot accept the risk of individual deaths, then you are, whether you admit it or not, accepting something worse: defeat.

There are millions of people of unknown allegiance inside our borders. There are hardened criminals here too. There are hostile nations and extremist movements that would gladly take American lives and have every intention of keeping soldiers from reaching base when the balloon goes up.

You must accept training accidents, negligent discharges, and lethal mistakes if you want a force that is truly ready for war.

And readiness does prevent war.

So no, the problem is not simply that he made a mistake and she punished him.

The problem is that she is almost certainly calling friends and fellow officers right now, and they are almost certainly telling her she did the right thing.

“What if his kid found it?”

“What if it went off by accident?”

“What if, what if, what if.”

And with every call, more smart people get pulled in. They come armed with better language, cleaner rationalizations, and safer-sounding excuses. Before long, the “she wasn’t wrong” line spreads like wildfire.

But she was wrong.

He made a mistake. She made a bigger one.

Neither of them should lose a career over this. But both of them need to understand commander’s intent.

Both need to grasp the broader implications of SECWAR’s directive.

Both need to reject safetyism and embrace fundamental safe practices.

And if she refuses, if she cares more about shielding a few individuals from a hypothetical risk of death than about preserving the strength, readiness, and deterrent power that protect millions of American children, then she should be removed.

I don’t care that she is a woman. I don’t care that woman tend to socialize problems amongst themselves more than men. What is dangerous is the fact those phone calls she has with friends and colleagues aren’t public.

Women are more socially. They are more chatty. They are less likely to accept an order from a man without discussing it amongst themselves first.

That’s a good thing. It’s a great thing.

We need more people challenging orders.

Problem is those discussions need to be made public. There needs to be documentation. But Navy culture doesn’t allow it.

What worries me the most isn’t the fact she disobeyed orders (she probably made the decision before it was announced) the problem is I know there are people whispering in her ear and others “she wasn’t wrong, what if a kid found that?”

She was wrong.

There is a silent resistance to everything Hegseth is doing. And the core of that resistance is whispering in the halls.  That’s not helping anyone…. John A Konrad up]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Dhillon-Says-AR15-Will-be-Protected-by-DOJ Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:11:51 +0000 olfart]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Dhillon-Says-AR15-Will-be-Protected-by-DOJ
https://x.com/AAGDhillon/status/2044503030612021611]]>
https://x.com/AAGDhillon/status/2044503030612021611]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Anyone-notice-tariff-changes Thu, 26 Mar 2026 20:52:09 +0000 MontanaLon]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Anyone-notice-tariff-changes
And about those corporations that are suing to recover the money they spent on tariffs. We all know that corporations don't actually pay for the tariffs, they pass them on to the customer, usually with a 30% markup. Meaning if they paid $1.00 in tariff the customer pays $1.30 in tariff expense at retail. So, technically, for every dollar they get back from the government for tariffs they paid, they should be refunding $1.30 to the customers that bought their merchandise. It was a huge mistake for SCOTUS to rule the tariffs unconstitutional, but it was an even bigger mistake to say that corporations could claw back what they already paid. Someone needs to sue all the corporations for their tariff recoveries because you know for sure they aren't going to hand that money back to the consumers who actually paid the tariffs. 

Actually the DOJ should pursue that case for the consumers just to make it easy and the whole idea underlying it is that if they drop their cases against the government the government will drop their cases against the corporations. Yeah, the corporations may win back billions of dollars but if they face the possibility of having to pay back to customers a billion and 300 million, it might persuade them to just give it up.]]>
And about those corporations that are suing to recover the money they spent on tariffs. We all know that corporations don't actually pay for the tariffs, they pass them on to the customer, usually with a 30% markup. Meaning if they paid $1.00 in tariff the customer pays $1.30 in tariff expense at retail. So, technically, for every dollar they get back from the government for tariffs they paid, they should be refunding $1.30 to the customers that bought their merchandise. It was a huge mistake for SCOTUS to rule the tariffs unconstitutional, but it was an even bigger mistake to say that corporations could claw back what they already paid. Someone needs to sue all the corporations for their tariff recoveries because you know for sure they aren't going to hand that money back to the consumers who actually paid the tariffs. 

Actually the DOJ should pursue that case for the consumers just to make it easy and the whole idea underlying it is that if they drop their cases against the government the government will drop their cases against the corporations. Yeah, the corporations may win back billions of dollars but if they face the possibility of having to pay back to customers a billion and 300 million, it might persuade them to just give it up.]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Nah-no-grooming-going-on-here Fri, 20 Feb 2026 15:42:52 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Nah-no-grooming-going-on-here https://x.com/i/status/2024805280605749561

I should add a description here. Mn tranny state representative argues against age verification for porn sites because kids need education.]]> https://x.com/i/status/2024805280605749561

I should add a description here. Mn tranny state representative argues against age verification for porn sites because kids need education.]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Somali-daycare Tue, 06 Jan 2026 20:49:43 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Somali-daycare ]]> ]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Groyperism Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:02:05 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Groyperism In this article the author delves into the factors propelling this swing, mainly loss of faith in our institutions and hopelessness. https://roddreher.substack.com/p/what-i-...washington
I've been called a right-winger but I've always been more of a conservative libertarian. This stuff scares me as much as communism does.
Wandering off into end-times prophecy, I've long maintained that the USA couldn't exist as it does today for the battle of armegeddon to take place with all the armys of the world against Israel. Maybe that time is closer than I thought.]]> In this article the author delves into the factors propelling this swing, mainly loss of faith in our institutions and hopelessness. https://roddreher.substack.com/p/what-i-...washington
I've been called a right-winger but I've always been more of a conservative libertarian. This stuff scares me as much as communism does.
Wandering off into end-times prophecy, I've long maintained that the USA couldn't exist as it does today for the battle of armegeddon to take place with all the armys of the world against Israel. Maybe that time is closer than I thought.]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-celebrating-mamdami-win Sat, 08 Nov 2025 11:34:01 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-celebrating-mamdami-win https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/198...YLNVg&s=19

Sharia law begins now!??? This left me dumbfounded.]]> https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/198...YLNVg&s=19

Sharia law begins now!??? This left me dumbfounded.]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-ICE-Shot-a-Violent-Terrorist-in-Chicago Sat, 04 Oct 2025 20:27:10 +0000 Rampy]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-ICE-Shot-a-Violent-Terrorist-in-Chicago
Agents were unable to move their vehicles and exited the car. One of the drivers who rammed the law enforcement vehicle was armed with a semi-automatic weapon. Law enforcement was forced to deploy their weapons and fire defensive shots at an armed US citizen who drove herself to the hospital to get care for wounds.
 
The armed woman was named in a @CBP intelligence bulletin last week for doxing agents and posting online ‘Hey to all my gang let’s fuck those mother fuckers up, don’t let them take anyone.’

Thankfully, no law enforcement officers were seriously injured in this attack.

Pritzker’s Chicago Police Department is leaving the shooting scene and refuses to assist us in securing the area. There is a growing crowd and we are deploying special operations to control the scene.

This is an evolving situation and we will give more information as soon as it becomes available.]]>
Agents were unable to move their vehicles and exited the car. One of the drivers who rammed the law enforcement vehicle was armed with a semi-automatic weapon. Law enforcement was forced to deploy their weapons and fire defensive shots at an armed US citizen who drove herself to the hospital to get care for wounds.
 
The armed woman was named in a @CBP intelligence bulletin last week for doxing agents and posting online ‘Hey to all my gang let’s fuck those mother fuckers up, don’t let them take anyone.’

Thankfully, no law enforcement officers were seriously injured in this attack.

Pritzker’s Chicago Police Department is leaving the shooting scene and refuses to assist us in securing the area. There is a growing crowd and we are deploying special operations to control the scene.

This is an evolving situation and we will give more information as soon as it becomes available.]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-NYC-mayor-s-race Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:44:33 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-NYC-mayor-s-race https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Oh-Texas%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6 Tue, 05 Aug 2025 01:49:21 +0000 Rampy]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Oh-Texas%E2%80%A6%E2%80%A6
"That investigation should extend to anyone who aided or abetted such potential crime. Reports indicate that many absentee Texas House Democrats have solicited or received funds to evade conducting legislative business and casting votes." 

Wonder what sort of assistance JB Pritzker has provided?]]>
"That investigation should extend to anyone who aided or abetted such potential crime. Reports indicate that many absentee Texas House Democrats have solicited or received funds to evade conducting legislative business and casting votes." 

Wonder what sort of assistance JB Pritzker has provided?]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Asset-forfeiture Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:35:59 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Asset-forfeiture https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charl...m-n2658906]]> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-charl...m-n2658906]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Vice-mayor-of-Cudahy-California-wow Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:00:00 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Vice-mayor-of-Cudahy-California-wow https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/1937577489099878740]]> https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/1937577489099878740]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Things-that-make-you-go-Hmmmmm Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:06:09 +0000 MontanaLon]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Things-that-make-you-go-Hmmmmm https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/06/the_democratic_national_committee_is_broke_and_broken.html


The democrats are broken, they've always been broken, I mean they grab onto loser ideas and then just ride them right into the ground. They put the crash in crash and burn. But now, they aren't just broken, they are broke. The donations have dried up. Curious how that happened right after USAID got shitcanned by DOGE. So, was the whole purpose of USAID to finance the democrat party? Is that why they fought so hard and continue to fight?

It is looking bad for the party of slavery.]]> https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/06/the_democratic_national_committee_is_broke_and_broken.html


The democrats are broken, they've always been broken, I mean they grab onto loser ideas and then just ride them right into the ground. They put the crash in crash and burn. But now, they aren't just broken, they are broke. The donations have dried up. Curious how that happened right after USAID got shitcanned by DOGE. So, was the whole purpose of USAID to finance the democrat party? Is that why they fought so hard and continue to fight?

It is looking bad for the party of slavery.]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Who-is-behind-the-riots Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:13:33 +0000 tommag]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Who-is-behind-the-riots https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/...-ice-riots]]> https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/...-ice-riots]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Trump-vs-Criminals Mon, 09 Jun 2025 01:49:33 +0000 Rampy]]> https://www.alpharomeo15.org/Thread-Trump-vs-Criminals
























]]>
























]]>