[FPC News] California “1-in-30” Firearm Ban Blocked Following Ninth Circuit Order
<p><strong>SAN FRANCISCO </strong><span style="font-weight: 400;">(August </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">15</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">, 2024) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has issued an </span><a href="https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5882/attachments/original/1723766604/2024.08.15_46-1_ORDER_Reversing_Stay.pdf?1723766604"><span style="font-weight: 400;">order</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> reversing the previously issued stay in FPC’s </span><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/nguyen"><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nguyen v. Bonta</span></em></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> lawsuit, which challenges California’s “one-gun-per-month” gun ban law. With the stay reversed, the final </span><a href="https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5882/attachments/original/1711657276/2024.03.28_070_Judgment.pdf?1711657276"><span style="font-weight: 400;">judgment</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> and injunction FPC secured at the district court is now in effect, which prevents the state from enforcing its “1-in-30” ban unless and until further order from the Court. The order, along with other case documents, can be viewed at </span><a href="http://firearmspolicy.org/nguyen"><span style="font-weight: 400;">firearmspolicy.org/nguyen</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
I tried to cut and paste the entire document as it is a public record but the formatting is lost making it a nightmare to read.
The long of it made short.
The FBI didn't preserve physical evidence at the scene. They cleaned up blood and other evidence on the roof themselves. Not even a beat cop will do that, so why did the FBI?
The FBI released the body for cremation 10 days post shooting. The county coroner was cut out of the loop of custody of the body. Very strange. Cremation means there is no longer any evidence related to the corpse and we just have to take the FBI's word about the autopsy being legit.
The assignment of USSS counter snipers for a former POTUS is unprecedented.
While the shot fired by the USSS counter sniper may have killed the shooter, it was likely the shot fired by the local SWAT sniper which ended the shooting. Remember how certain the were that only the shooter and the USSS had fired? Well, that was a lie.
This whole thing stinks of a deep state setup. The likely conclusion from the FBI will be they were unable to determine who the shooter was in contact with because the messages were encrypted, expect then a leftist in congress to demand that encrypted apps be made illegal, you know because someone tried to shoot Trump, even though they are well aware that the encrypted messages were with the FBI.
Spirits Review #49: Two Tigers - Blended Indian Whiskey!
Bottom Line: Fruitiness on the nose. Light burn and sweet fruit up front. Sweetness tastes of honey. Very smooth. The sweetness intensified over ice. 4 Thumbs up!
[FPC News] FPC Brief: New Mexico Carry Ban Unconstitutional
<p><strong>DENVER</strong><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (August 14, 2024) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced the filing of a brief with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in </span><a href="https://www.firearmspolicy.org/grisham"><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">Fort v. Grisham</span></em></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, its lawsuit challenging the New Mexico Governor’s total ban on carry in public parks and playgrounds. The brief can be viewed at</span> <a href="http://firearmspolicy.org/grisham"><span style="font-weight: 400;">firearmspolicy.org/grisham</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
