I have seen this before and using a fixed mark on the smaller circle as an up reference and counting revolutions so the fixed mark is orientated up in order to call it a revolution is flawed.
The wording of the question is the test. You must read it the way the writer wants it to be read.
There is the physical rotation and the visual rotation. If you straightened out the circles into lines the answer is three but because the tracking goes around a circle the visual rotation does not make a full rotation.
The wording of the question is the test. You must read it the way the writer wants it to be read.
There is the physical rotation and the visual rotation. If you straightened out the circles into lines the answer is three but because the tracking goes around a circle the visual rotation does not make a full rotation.
