Here in California Del Norte, formerly known as Washington, removal of suppressors from the gca68 would make them illegal to obtain. Here is a cut and paste from rcw 9.41.250.
(1) Every person who:
(a) Manufactures, sells, or disposes of or possesses any instrument or weapon of the kind usually known as slung shot, sand club, or metal knuckles, or spring blade knife;
(b) Furtively carries with intent to conceal any dagger, dirk, pistol, or other dangerous weapon; or
© Uses any contrivance or device for suppressing the noise of any firearm unless the suppressor is legally registered and possessed in accordance with federal law,
is guilty of a gross misdemeanor punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.
Since the form 4473 isn't a registry, (yeah, right) we wouldn't be able to purchase one if they're removed from gca68.
Now that I've read it again, subsection c says any person that USES one would be guilty so I guess I could still purchase a new one but not be able to use it.
(This post was last modified: 07-05-2025, 09:09 AM by tommag.)
(1) Every person who:
(a) Manufactures, sells, or disposes of or possesses any instrument or weapon of the kind usually known as slung shot, sand club, or metal knuckles, or spring blade knife;
(b) Furtively carries with intent to conceal any dagger, dirk, pistol, or other dangerous weapon; or
© Uses any contrivance or device for suppressing the noise of any firearm unless the suppressor is legally registered and possessed in accordance with federal law,
is guilty of a gross misdemeanor punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW.
Since the form 4473 isn't a registry, (yeah, right) we wouldn't be able to purchase one if they're removed from gca68.
Now that I've read it again, subsection c says any person that USES one would be guilty so I guess I could still purchase a new one but not be able to use it.